Sunday, May 19, 2024

Notice published on July 17 by Environmental Protection Agency

The US Environmental Protection Agency published a three page notice on July 17, according to the U.S. Government Publishing Office.

The notice is focused on Announcement of Public Meeting; Opportunity to Comment on Implications of Revised Bt Crops Reassessment for Regulatory Decisions Affecting These Products, and on Potential Elements of Regulatory Options.

More than half of the Agency's employees are engineers, scientists and protection specialists. The Climate Reality Project, a global climate activist organization, accused Agency leadership in the last five years of undermining its main mission.

Notices are required documents detailing rules and regulations being proposed by each federal department. This allows the public to see what issues legislators and federal departments are focusing on.

Any person or organization can comment on the proposed rules. Departments and agencies must then address “significant issues raised in comments and discuss any changes made,” the Federal Register says.

Notices published by the Environmental Protection Agency on July 17

Title
Revisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Pinal County Air Quality Control District
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Bay Area Air Quality Management District and El Dorado County Air Pollution Control District
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Kern County Air Pollution Control District, Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution District, Modoc County Air Pollution Control District
Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives: Reformulated Gasoline Adjustment
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Bay Area Air Quality Management District, El Dorado County Air Pollution Control District
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Kern County Air Pollution Control District, Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution District, Modoc County Air Pollution Control District
Announcement of Public Meeting; Opportunity to Comment on Implications of Revised Bt Crops Reassessment for Regulatory Decisions Affecting These Products, and on Potential Elements of Regulatory Options