Tuesday, February 18, 2020

Consumer interests under threat if RSF proposals are introduced

Consumer interests are at stake if the renewable fuel standard (RFS) is not scrapped, or radically reformed, a writer who pens the American Petroleum Institute’s (API) blog recently declared.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently considering proposals for 2017 ethanol and cellulosic biofuel levels.

But the API fears the proposals will lead to levels of ethanol that could cause damage to vehicles.

“EPA’s proposal relies on unrealistic increases in the sales of higher ethanol blends, despite the fact most cars on the road today aren’t warrantied for them and that U.S. motorists have largely rejected them,” Mark Green, who writes the API’s Energy Tomorrow Blog, said.

“More broadly, EPA also appears tone deaf to the concerns of American voters,” Green wrote. “Polling last fall found that 77 percent of Americans are concerned that auto manufacturers have warned they may not provide warranty coverage for vehicle damage caused by ethanol fuel blends greater than 10 percent if the vehicle wasn’t specifically designed for it.”

Congress first established the renewable fuel standard with the enactment of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

This initial RFS mandated that a minimum of 4 billion gallons be used in 2006, rising to 7.5 billion gallons by 2012, a review by the Congressional Research Service explained.

Two years later, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 greatly expanded the biofuel mandate volumes and extended the date through 2022.

The expanded RFS required the annual use of 9 billion gallons of biofuels in 2008, rising to 36 billion gallons in 2022, with at least 16 billion gallons from cellulosic biofuels, and a cap of 15 billion gallons for corn-starch ethanol.

“One unsettling aspect of the federal RFS is that for some time it has appeared — from public statements anyway — that EPA considers the program an ongoing experiment," Green wrote.

He argued the EPA was testing the ability of government policy to change or modify the behavior of free markets and the fueling choices of individual consumers, with consumers as the guinea pigs.

“The results were logged in long ago: Flaws in the RFS and EPA’s management of the program mark it for repeal or significant reform," Green wrote. "RFS mandates for increasing ethanol use in the nation’s fuel supply threaten breaching the ethanol 'blend wall,' risking impacts to the broader economy and consumers’ wallets.”

The EPA proposals for 2017 levels will test the blend wall, the point where required use of ethanol in the fuel supply exceeds the safe level of 10 percent, the API contends.

The API argues the ethanol volume level shouldn’t exceed 9.7 percent, to ensure the availability of fuels that consumers want to buy, including ethanol-free gasoline.

EPA’s proposal would set the level somewhere between 10.3 percent and 11 percent, potentially encouraging refiners to produce more higher ethanol-volume E15 gasoline.

Studies have shown this could damage engines and fuel systems in millions of vehicles in use today, Green wrote.

Organizations in this Story

American Petroleum Institute

Want to get notified whenever we write about American Petroleum Institute ?
Next time we write about American Petroleum Institute, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.